Why architecture matters here

Debate can improve accuracy on hard reasoning but is expensive. Architecture matters because proposers + judge + rounds compose.

Advertisement

The architecture: every piece explained

The top strip is roles. Question. Proposer A. Proposer B. Critic.

The middle row is process. Rebuttal round. Judge. Final answer. Rounds cap.

The lower rows are ops. Bias risk. Metrics. Ops — persona + judge + termination.

Multi-agent debate — proposer + critic + judge + roundscompete for better answerQuestionpromptProposer Aanswer + reasoningProposer Bdifferent personaCriticattack eachRebuttal rounddefend / reviseJudgepick winnerFinal answerwith rationaleRounds capbudgetBias riskjudge collusionMetricsaccuracy + latencyOps — persona + judge + terminationrebutjudgefinalizecapavoidwatchwatchoperateoperate
Multi-agent debate: proposers, critic, judge over rounds.
Advertisement

End-to-end flow

End-to-end: question posed. A and B answer. Critic attacks both. Round 2: each defends or revises. Judge sees all and picks. Return winner with rationale.