Why architecture matters here

RAG fails on chunking (too big or small), retrieval (missed context), and hallucination (model ignores context). Architecture matters because each layer decides quality independently.

Advertisement

The architecture: every piece explained

The top strip is the ingest pipeline. Documents raw. Chunker semantic splits. Embedder vectorizes. Vector store holds embeddings + metadata.

The middle row is the query path. Query embed vectorizes user question. Retrieval ANN + optional hybrid (BM25 + vector). Reranker — cross-encoder — refines top-K. Generator LLM with retrieved context.

The lower rows are quality. Eval harness — faithfulness + relevance + hit rate. Feedback loop from user signals. Ops — freshness, PII, governance.

RAG — chunking + embedding + vector store + retrieval + rerank + generation + evalgrounding LLMs in your dataDocumentsraw corpusChunkersemantic splitsEmbeddervector encodingVector storeFAISS / Milvus / pgvectorQuery embeduser query → vectorRetrievalANN + hybridRerankercross-encoderGeneratorLLM with contextEval harnessfaithfulness + relevanceFeedback loopuser thumbs → tuneOps — freshness + PII + governancequerysearchscorecitemeasurelearnlearnoperateoperate
RAG pipeline from documents to grounded generation.
Advertisement

End-to-end flow

End-to-end: user asks. Query embedded. Retrieval fetches top-20 chunks. Cross-encoder reranks to top-5. LLM generates with citations. Eval harness confirms faithfulness. Feedback tunes chunk size + retrieval params next cycle.